Essays/linkedin/ we thought patents were our moat. we were wrong.

First published:

Last Edited:

Number of edits:

🛡️ Early on, we poured cash and time into patents, convinced they’d keep competitors at bay. The truth? Patents are necessary but not sufficient.

Deep‑tech ideas are hard to copy, but barriers erode fast. What saved us wasn’t a stack of filings—it was our relationship with early customers and our speed.

Patents protect technology; they don’t protect markets. Your real moat is understanding your users better than anyone else and iterating faster than a newcomer can file paperwork. That’s why Steve Blank’s customer development mantra—talk to customers, learn, and pivot—is more valuable than a patent lawyernotes.aquiles.me.

I’m not anti‑patent. File strategically. But don’t mistake IP for an automatic moat. Have you ever relied too much on patents? What did you learn?


Backlinks

These are the other notes that link to this one.

Nothing links here, how did you reach this page then?

Comment

Share your thoughts on this note. Comments are not public, they are messages sent directly to my inbox.
Aquiles Carattino
Aquiles Carattino
This note you are reading is part of my digital garden. Follow the links to learn more, and remember that these notes evolve over time. After all, this website is not a blog.
© 2024 Aquiles Carattino
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
Privacy Policy