Communicators fail at explaining what an algorithm is
<p>
The world moves fast, and communicators are failing at doing their jobs. We entered a time when a lot of people is talking about
<a class="wikilink" href="/artificial_intelligence/">
artificial intelligence
</a>
and
<a class="wikilink" href="/machine_learning/">
machine learning
</a>
, but few even understand what an
<a class="wikilink" href="/algorithm/">
algorithm
</a>
is. I even found a book about
<a class="wikilink" href="/machine_learning/">
machine learning
</a>
(in Spanish: "
<a class="wikilink" href="/las_máquinas_no_pueden_soñar/">
Las máquinas no pueden soñar
</a>
") written by someone who defines himself as
<em>
an expert
</em>
in which the word
<em>
statistics
</em>
is not mentioned only once.
</p>
<p>
If a journalist can manage to get funding to write a book with that kind of content, where are we going?
</p>
<p>
Communicators are transmitting information from a highly biased position without ever acknowledging it. I don't even know whether they acknowledge it at least privately.
</p>
Backlinks
These are the other notes that link to this one.
Nothing links here, how did you reach this page then?
Comment
Share your thoughts on this note. Comments are not public, they are
messages sent directly to my inbox.