Git is a poorly designed tool

First published:

Last Edited:

Number of edits:

I crossed a tweet from Luciano Ramalho replying to this tweet :

I teach a course in Free Software and Collaborative Development. Every single student eventually messes up their repo, no exceptions. Fixing it up is a huge motivation to learn more advanced git commands and this is now part of the course 😅

With this:

The hallmark of a poorly designed tool: makes it easy to screw up, and difficult to fix.

And it may me see #Git with a different light. I have been in love with git for a while already, but never pondered the real benefits and disadvantages of the tool itself. The fact that so many people was suddenly doing version control, the onset of Github , Bitbucket , and Gitlab , in my view it was already a win.

However, taking a deep thought, it is true that git is very error prone. I had to help a lot of people in different context trying to revert back something wrong with Git. In many cases the quickest way was to delete the folder and get a fresh clone out of the remote server. Even tough a valid approach, it points to the fundamental flaws of the tool.

I started working on the idea of of a book about Git for Scientists . I need to reflect deeper on the subject, since it may be that I need to add plenty of topics to avoid/correct mistakes and not just the linear, straightforward approach that most content online shows.


These are the other notes that link to this one.

Nothing links here, how did you reach this page then?


Share your thoughts on this note
Aquiles Carattino
Aquiles Carattino
This note you are reading is part of my digital garden. Follow the links to learn more, and remember that these notes evolve over time. After all, this website is not a blog.
© 2021 Aquiles Carattino
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
Privacy Policy