Ip regulations for ml discoveries

First published:

Last Edited:

Number of edits:

SDL (self-driving labs) are tools able to make discoveries of new materials and processes that are not explicitly defined. Thanks to developments in machine learning and artificial intelligence, there's a relatively high likelihood that a system can "discover" something useful. But that would trigger concerns regarding the intellectual property ownership. (See: 202504281141 Roadblocks in the future of SDLs).

In the development of intellectual property, there's normally a creative step. There was this discussion regarding the photo taken by a monkey: was the copyright in the hands of the animal or of the photographer. Is the triggering of the shutter "creative enough?" compared to setting up the parameters?

And the same discussion will happen with SDL (self-driving labs). Who will own the IP of a discovery made by an algorithm? The owner of the lab, the "user" who prepared it and triggered it? So far, there's little certainty about how patents will interact with algorithmic discoveries.


Backlinks

These are the other notes that link to this one.

Comment

Share your thoughts on this note. Comments are not public, they are messages sent directly to my inbox.
Aquiles Carattino
Aquiles Carattino
This note you are reading is part of my digital garden. Follow the links to learn more, and remember that these notes evolve over time. After all, this website is not a blog.
© 2024 Aquiles Carattino
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
Privacy Policy