Linux has a package manager, why avoid it

First published:

Last Edited:

Number of edits:

I found myself installing software such as Obsidian, Zettlr, Zoom that require downloading binaries sometimes from a website, sometimes from Github. Obsidian and Zettlr offer AppImages that have the ability to update themselves, while Zoom distributes a .deb file that must be installed with root privileges. Linux in general, and Ubuntu in particular, grew out of having a fantastic package manager. It may create a bit of overhead for the developers, but I don't think a company such as Zoom would not have the resources. Especially compared with distributing binaries that require manual updates.

I am getting tired of being treated like a Windows user from the 90's. Linux was built to do much more, Linux users are expecting much more from the program developers they consume.

Tags: #rants #linux-package-manager #linux #ubuntu #binary-distribution


These are the other notes that link to this one.

Nothing links here, how did you reach this page then?


Share your thoughts on this note
Aquiles Carattino
Aquiles Carattino
This note you are reading is part of my digital garden. Follow the links to learn more, and remember that these notes evolve over time. After all, this website is not a blog.
© 2021 Aquiles Carattino
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
Privacy Policy