Non-egalitarian groups reside with fewer unrelated individuals
<p>Since <a class="wikilink" href="/egalitarian_societies_explain_diveristy_in_hunter-gatherer_groups/">egalitarian societies explain diveristy in hunter-gatherer groups</a>, it is fair to ask whether the opposite is also true. A model to predict the distribution of group relatedness of egalitarian societies can also be applied to non-egalitarian ones and compared to the Paranan farmers[<a class="litnote tooltip" href="/literature/@dyble2015">@dyble2015<span class="tooltiptext">Sex equality can explain the unique social structure of hunter-gatherer bands</span></a>] :</p>
<p><img alt="Non egalitarian groups social distribution" src="Screenshot 2021-03-27 at 13.55.47.png" /></p>
<p>Comparing both groups, and assuming that modern hunter-gatherers preserve ancestral organization structures, it is possible to think that the advent of <a class="wikilink" href="/literature/202103271415_agriculture_created_new_social_hierarchies/">literature/202103271415 agriculture created new social hierarchies</a>.</p>
Backlinks
These are the other notes that link to this one.
Comment
Share your thoughts on this note. Comments are not public, they are
messages sent directly to my inbox.