The status quo of the research industry
This is what [@ioannidis2014How to Make More Published Research True] describes as the status quo of the research industry:
- Research is an industry with over 15M people authoring papers (25M were published between 1996 and 2011)
- Results and applications are exaggerated, translation (i.e. technology transfer) is slow and inefficient
- 85% of research resources are wasted (#TODO: check reference # 5)
- Non-meritocratic practices like nepotism, sexism, unwarranted conservatism are probably widespread
- There is little experimental evidence on how peer review should be done and when (protocol-based, manuscript-based, post-publication)
- Scientific structures can be traced back to the Middle Ages (academic hierarchies) or the 17th century: professional societies, journal publishing. Is this still valid today?
These are the other notes that link to this one.
Nothing links here, how did you reach this page then?
Join my experiment of better thinking and interesting discussions