Reproducibility is the key factor of open science

First published:

Last Edited:

Number of edits:

Although open science (including open hardware) practices have many moral benefits, the key aspect of it all should always revolve around reproducibility of scientific results. People struggle on endless discussions about the definition of open

The reality is that science has a very severe crisis with reproducibility. The paramount paradigm of scientific discovery should be that others can perform the same experiment and get the same results. The semantics are secondary, what is real is that the only way of being able to reproduce an experiment is with enough information[@hohlbein2021a].

Using reproducibility as a guiding principle, the other problems would self-align. There may be a patent in the middle, trademarks, proprietary algorithms. But nothing should be in between reproducing results, or it should not be called science anymore.


Share your thoughts on this note
Aquiles Carattino
Aquiles Carattino
This note you are reading is part of my digital garden. Follow the links to learn more, and remember that these notes evolve over time. After all, this website is not a blog.
© 2021 Aquiles Carattino
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
Privacy Policy