Science after wwii has stagnated

First published:

Last Edited:

Number of edits:

After WWII the GPD growth of both industrialized and emerging economies is slower than what it was at the beginning of the XX century. This can be attributed to lack of development of new technologies that can improve economic efficiency, and not necessarily because of depletion of the low-hanging fruit in science ([[@bhattacharya2020Stagnation and Scientific Incentives]]).

This assumption opens many questions: first whether GDP is a reliable metric of growth or welfare. The second is whether correlating GDP to scientific productivity is a reasonable proxy for progress. The third is whether war or conflict fuel economic growth.


Share your thoughts on this note
Aquiles Carattino
Aquiles Carattino
This note you are reading is part of my digital garden. Follow the links to learn more, and remember that these notes evolve over time. After all, this website is not a blog.
© 2021 Aquiles Carattino
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
Privacy Policy